Introduction to the Occasional Series
Today, there are concerns raised in
some quarters that federal government programs are infringing on Americans’
First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, and Fifth Amendment American liberties.
These concerns relate to NSA secret surveillance of law-abiding American
citizens.
Many Americans do not understand that they can be harmed
when they give up their claim to Constitutional liberties. Many Americans are
wont to say, “If I have nothing to hide, I have nothing to fear.” Or they may
say, “I am happy to accept the curtailment of these liberties, because I am
afraid of terrorists, and I am confident that the NSA activities are motivated
purely by the desire to protect Americans from terrorists.” What Americans do
not say, but which may accurately describe their inner thought processes, is “I
wasn’t using my First, Fourth, and Fifth Amendment liberties, so I don’t see
the harm in giving them up.”
In this occasional series, I will profile Americans who have been harmed as a consequence of government usurpations of these liberties, in arguing that these liberties matter and that they deserve a vigorous defense.
In this occasional series, I will profile Americans who have been harmed as a consequence of government usurpations of these liberties, in arguing that these liberties matter and that they deserve a vigorous defense.
Waldo Salt
During his long career as a Hollywood screenwriter, Waldo
Salt wrote screenplays for notoriously bad movies such as Taras Bulba. For a period of time he wrote forgettable scripts for
episodes of television shows and commercials. Later in life, however, Waldo
Salt showed unmistakable genius. He won academy awards for Midnight Cowboy and Coming Home, and was nominated for an academy award for the 1973
film Serpico.
Waldo Salt |
The story of Serpico
is the story of a New York City police detective who is determined to expose
police department corruption, who doggedly pursues this cause even after it
becomes obvious that his superiors within the department will oppose him at
every step of the way. Thus, it is the story is of a man who values civic
virtue more highly than the self-interested goal of professional advancement.
Mr. Salt discovered his own genius after his life had been
nearly destroyed. In 1951, he was found guilty of being a communist
sympathizer, and as a consequence, his name was added to a Hollywood blacklist
of individuals who would no longer be given work. As recounted in a PBS
documentary,
Though the blacklist had been lifted, much of [Waldo Salt’s]
life had fallen into ruin. Divorced, and sick with pneumonia and despair, Salt
was living in a cheap New York hotel trying to write television scripts. “I
ended up at fifty, over-the-hill, thinking I had no future,” Salt explained.
“Finally, I realized that I had allowed myself to write less than I could.”
According to fellow writer Ian Hunter, “From then on, Waldo approached
screenwriting as an artist (source).”
During his years on the
blacklist, Mr. Salt could only be paid if he agreed that his work would not be
credited. Sometimes, he wrote under his wife’s name.
The Truth of the Allegations
As it happens, Mr. Salt was a member of America’s Communist
Party. Of course, the question of whether one supports or opposes communism is
beside the point. It is fairly certain that Mr. Salt never plotted the violent
overthrow of the United States. Persecuting Americans because of their
political views goes against the values enshrined in the United States
Constitution. That Constitution was written by men who had lived in fear of
being punished by the British Government during colonial days, and when they
shared their political views in newspapers, they used pseudonyms.
Blacklisting as an Economic Sanction
The Hollywood blacklist was a form of economic sanction against individuals. It relied on the cooperation
of private industry. Once an individual was brought before a hearing to discuss
his or her alleged communist sympathies, and regardless of innocence or guilt,
he or she would be fired and later discover it to be virtually impossible to
find work elsewhere. About 80% of people who were summoned to these hearings
lost their jobs, and the total number of who lost their jobs is about 10,000 (source).
It is worth reflecting on the fact that Hollywood bosses
were more than willing to give in to pressure from Joe McCarthy and his
supporters. A typical Hollywood boss probably weighed the options thusly: (a) I
could allow my reputation to be tarnished by people who accuse me of harboring
communist sympathizers, and lose money or even my job in the process, or (b) I
can fire an employee and find someone else to do the work, and avoid any
trouble. A person who had both the moral clarity to see McCarthyism for what it
was and the moral conviction to risk his or her career for the sake of
principle might choose option “a.” A
self-interested individual would certainly
choose option “b.”
Al Pacino in Serpico |
What did Joe McCarthy Want?
It is possible that the NSA is engaged in its secret surveillance
of Americans solely for the purpose of protecting Americans from terrorists. It
is possible that Joe McCarthy engaged in his campaign of anti-communism solely
for the purpose of protecting Americans from the perceived threat of communist
infiltration and subversion. He was, in fact, instrumental in uncovering Alger
Hiss, who according to the CIA, was a bona fide Soviet spy working in the U.S.
government (source).
Julius Rosenberg, likewise, was probably a Soviet spy (source).
Even if we give McCarthy credit for being well-intentioned and not a
power-hungry demagogue it’s worth reflecting on whether the discovery of these
two spies was worth the cost in thousands of ruined lives and reputations.
Waldo Salt: An Epilogue
In one scene in the movie Serpico, the hero is warned that if he persists in trying to
uncover corruption in the police department, he would be putting his life in
danger. The danger wouldn’t come in the form of cold-blooded murder by another
officer. Instead, the danger would flow naturally from his social exclusion from the bond of loyalty that officers otherwise share.
Nobody has to take a shot at you.
I'm not saying anything’s going to happen. I'm saying it could happen.
I mean, there’s lots of ways.
They can just not be there when you need them.
Somebody comes at you with a gun, they look the other way.
Or they can send you in first enough times... until finally
one day you’re gonna walk in the wrong door.
Six months before his death in 1987, Waldo Salt accepted the
Laurel Award for Screen Achievement
from the Writers’ Guild. During his
acceptance speech, he said, “As writers true to ourselves … if we’re good,
we’ll always be in trouble. Let’s be sure we deserve it.”
No comments:
Post a Comment